4.1 Review

The T helper 17-regulatory T cell axis in transplant rejection and tolerance

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 326-331

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32832ce88e

关键词

interleukin-17; regulatory T cells; T helper 17; transcription factors; transplantation

资金

  1. MRC [G0500429, G0801537] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/005/25303] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0801537, G0600698B, G0500429] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0801537, G0500429] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are potential therapeutic tools in averting transplant rejection and promoting lifelong tolerance. However, Tregs can be subverted by inflammatory conditions, resulting in a T helper 17 (Th17) cell response. This review looks at the relationship between Tregs and Th17 cells. Recent findings Both naturally occurring and transforming growth factor-beta-induced Tregs can be converted into Th17 cells in the presence of inflammatory cytokines. Transforming growth factor-beta upregulates the Treg transcription factor, forkhead box P3, as well as the Th17 transcription factor, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor-gamma. However, forkhead box P3 binds to retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gamma, inhibiting its promotion of IL-17 gene transcription. Inflammatory cytokines can disrupt this interaction through the inhibition of forkhead box P3 expression by signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Summary The plasticity of the Treg population during inflammation presents a challenge to the use of Tregs as a therapeutic tool in solid organ transplantation. Investigations into the Th17-Treg axis have identified a number of potential pharmacological targets to avoid the risk of conversion to Th17 cells, but further work must be done before we can separate the benefits of Treg therapy from the hazards of the Th17 response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据