4.1 Review

Pretransplant immune risk assessment

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 650-655

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32833281f8

关键词

B-cell memory; ELISpot; human leukocyte antigen antibodies; sCD30; T-cell memory; transplantation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgerneinschaft (DIFG) [SFB 650]
  2. Reprogramming the Immune System for Establishment of Tolerance (RISET)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Despite the introduction of advanced immunosuppressive drug therapies, clinical and subclinical rejections still occur in many graft recipients with a negative impact on the long-term transplant outcome. The immunological status of the patients awaiting the transplantation is a key factor for these processes. Here we Summarize the recent efforts to identify and develop biomarkers and functional assays that allow an individual pretransplant risk assessment. Recent findings been New sensitive techniques assessing T-cell memory and B-cell activation have developed. Furthermore, the expression level of soluble and molecular markers reflecting the activation state of the immune system and donor graft intrinsic factors have been shown to influence graft outcome. Summary A variety of parameters and assays that determine the pretransplant immune activation status has been developed. Some of these assays have already been used prospectively to define high-risk patients receiving advanced immunosuppressive induction therapy. However, the conflicting results obtained in different studies show that biomarker analysis and functional assays performance need to be further standardized and validated in large prospective trials before they can be routinely implemented into a pretransplant risk assessment. Subsequently, a combined effort to design pretransplant risk stratification algorithms should lead to personalized immunosuppressive treatment regimes and improved graft survival and long-term graft function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据