4.4 Review

Age-related Eye Disease Study 2: perspectives, recommendations, and unanswered questions

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 186-190

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000046

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; antioxidant vitamins; lutein; omega-3 fatty acids; zeaxanthin

资金

  1. National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health (NEI/NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland [HHS-N-260-2005-00007-C]
  2. National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health (NEI/NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland (ADB) [N01-EY-5-0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewThis review provides a perspective on the Age-related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) including a summary of the goals and rationale of the study, major findings, subsequent management recommendations, and questions that remain to be answered.Recent findingsThe primary goal of the AREDS2 was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lutein plus zeaxanthin and/or omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated acid supplementation in reducing the risk of developing advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD). AREDS2 also investigated the effects of omitting -carotene and reducing the concentration of zinc from the original AREDS formulation. Although primary analysis from the AREDS2 did not reveal a benefit of daily supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin on AMD progression, secondary exploratory analyses suggested that lutein/zeaxanthin were helpful in reducing this risk. Comparison of low-dose to higher-dose zinc showed no significant benefit.SummaryThe overall evidence on the beneficial and adverse effects from AREDS2 and other studies suggests that lutein/zeaxanthin could be more appropriate than -carotene in AREDS-type supplements. Questions remain regarding the AREDS2 study results such as: whether the findings are generalizable to the population as a whole, what is the long-term safety profile of lutein/zeaxanthin supplementation, should other carotenoids be included in AREDS-type supplements, and at what optimal doses?

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据