4.4 Review

Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 135-143

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff23e

关键词

intraocular pressure; outflow facility; Schlemm's canal; trabecular meshwork

资金

  1. Allergan, Inc.
  2. National Eye Institute [EY017007, EY019696, EY003279, EY008247, EY010572]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Regulation of intraocular pressure by the conventional (trabecular) outflow pathway is complicated, involving a myriad of mechanical and chemical signals. In most, intraocular pressure is maintained within a tight range over a lifetime. Unfortunately in some, dysfunction results in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. In the context of established knowledge, this review summarizes recent investigations of conventional outflow function, with the goal of identifying areas for future inquiry and therapeutic targeting. Recent findings Mechanical stimulation of conventional outflow cells due to intraocular pressure fluctuations impacts contractility, gene expression, pore formation, enzyme activity, and signaling. Numerous local signaling mediators in the conventional pathway such as bioactive lipids, cytokines, nitric oxide, and nucleotides participate in the regulation of outflow. Interestingly outflow through the conventional pathway is not uniform, but segmental, with passageways constantly changing due to focal protease activity of trabecular cells clearing extracellular matrix materials. The relationship between extracellular matrix expression and trabecular meshwork contractility appears to coordinately impact outflow resistance and is the target of a new class of drugs, the Rho kinase inhibitors. Summary The conventional outflow pathway is a dynamic, pressure-sensitive tissue that is vulnerable to pathology on many fronts, each representing a therapeutic opportunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据