4.7 Article

Neuronal Differentiation in Schwann Cell Lineage Underlies Postnatal Neurogenesis in the Enteric Nervous System

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 35, 期 27, 页码 9879-9888

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1239-15.2015

关键词

enteric nervous system; neural crest cells; neurogenesis; oligoganglionosis; RET; Schwann cells

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology Science Research Funds [2212005]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [25460279]
  3. Naito Foundation
  4. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
  5. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  6. RIKEN
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25460279, 15H05345] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elucidation of the cellular identity of neuronal precursors provides mechanistic insights into the development and pathophysiology of the nervous system. In the enteric nervous system (ENS), neurogenesis persists from midgestation to the postnatal period. Cellular mechanism underlying the long-term neurogenesis in the ENS has remained unclear. Using genetic fate mapping in mice, we show here that a subset of Schwann cell precursors (SCPs), which invades the gut alongside the extrinsic nerves, adopts a neuronal fate in the postnatal period and contributes to the ENS. We found SCP-derived neurogenesis in the submucosal region of the small intestine in the absence of vagal neural crest-derived ENS precursors. Under physiological conditions, SCPs comprised up to 20% of enteric neurons in the large intestine and gave rise mainly to restricted neuronal subtypes, calretinin-expressing neurons. Genetic ablation of Ret, the signaling receptor for glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, in SCPs caused colonic oligoganglionosis, indicating that SCP-derived neurogenesis is essential to ENS integrity. Identification of Schwann cells as a physiological neurogenic source provides novel insight into the development and disorders of neural crest-derived tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据