4.7 Article

Detection of p75NTR Trimers: Implications for Receptor Stoichiometry and Activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 35, 期 34, 页码 11911-11920

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0591-15.2015

关键词

p75(NTR); proNGF; signaling unit; stoichiometry; TNF receptor; trimerization

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS21072, AG025970, HD23315, NS030687, NS070173, NS064114]
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant [325420]
  3. IBRO Return Home Fellowship
  4. ISN-CAEN Return Home Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75(NTR)) is a multifunctional receptor that participates in many critical processes in the nervous system, ranging from apoptosis to synaptic plasticity and morphological events. It is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily, whose members undergo trimeric oligomerization. Interestingly, p75(NTR) interacts with dimeric ligands (i.e., proneurotrophins or mature neurotrophins), but several of the intracellular adaptors that mediate p75(NTR) signaling are trimeric (i.e., TNFR-associated factor 6 or TRAF6). Consequently, the active receptor signaling unit remains uncertain. To identify the functional receptor complex, we evaluated its oligomerization in vitro and in mice brain tissues using a combination of biochemical techniques. We found that the most abundant homotypic arrangement for p75(NTR) is a trimer and that monomers and trimers coexist at the cell surface. Interestingly, trimers are not required for ligand-independent or ligand-dependent p75(NTR) activation in a growth cone retraction functional assay. However, monomers are capable of inducing acute morphological effects in neurons. We propose that p75(NTR) activation is regulated by its oligomerization status and its levels of expression. These results indicate that the oligomeric state of p75(NTR) confers differential responses and offers an explanation for the diverse and contradictory actions of this receptor in the nervous system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据