4.4 Review

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular ocular diseases other than age-related macular degeneration

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 166-174

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328329d173

关键词

anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy; bevacizumab; neovascularization; pegaptanib sodium; ranibizumab

资金

  1. Genentech USA, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies that arrest choroidal angiogenesis and reduce vascular permeability have revolutionized clinical practices for neovascular eye diseases. This review describes anti-VEGF strategies that are being evaluated in ocular diseases, other than neovascular age-related macular degeneration, in which neovascularization plays a critical role in pathogenesis. Recent findings Early studies of the anti-VEGF agents, pegaptanib sodium, ranibizumab, bevacizurnab, VEGF trap, and bevasiranib in the treatment of various neovascular diseases (e.g., diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, choroidal neovascularization) have shown promising results. The efficacy and safety of these agents, either alone or combined with standard treatments (e.g., laser photocoagulation), anti-inflammatory agents, or other non-VEGF-based antiangiogenic therapies, is actively investigated. Non-VEGIF-driven pathways and growth factors other than VEGF may play important roles in pathogenesis and are included in certain combination therapies with VEGF inhibitors. Summary The discovery of VEGF-A's role in the pathogenesis of neovascular ocular disease provided a strong rationale for the development of anti-VEGF-based therapies. There is now ample evidence that anti-VEGF therapies are viable treatment options for these diseases. Nevertheless, large, randomized controlled trials are still awaited to confirm early safety and efficacy findings from small, open-label prospective studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据