4.1 Review

Stratified reproduction, family planning care and the double edge of history

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 539-544

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000121

关键词

family planning; reproductive justice; sterilization; stratified reproduction

资金

  1. Greenwall Foundation's Faculty Scholars Program in Bioethics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review There is a growing clinical consensus that Medicaid sterilization consent protections should be revisited because they impede desired care for many women. Here, we consider the broad social and ideological contexts for past sterilization abuses, beyond informed consent. Recent findings Throughout the US history, the fertility and childbearing of poor women and women of color were not valued equally to those of affluent white women. This is evident in a range of practices and policies, including black women's treatment during slavery, removal of Native children to off-reservation boarding schools and coercive sterilizations of poor white women and women of color. Thus, reproductive experiences throughout the US history were stratified. This ideology of stratified reproduction persists today in social welfare programs, drug policy and programs promoting long-acting reversible contraception. Summary At their core, sterilization abuses reflected an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which some women's fertility was devalued compared to other women's fertility. Revisiting Medicaid sterilization regulations must therefore put issues of race, ethnicity, class, power and resources not just informed consent at the center of analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据