4.5 Review

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 795-801

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328359da15

关键词

antibodies; cancer; cerebellar degeneration; Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome; limbic encephalitis; paraneoplastic

资金

  1. Fondo Investigaciones Sanitarias [FIS PS09/0193]
  2. National Institutes of Health [RO1NS077851]
  3. National Cancer Institute [RO1CA089054]
  4. Fundacio la Marato [TV3, FIS PI11/01780]
  5. Euroimmun
  6. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review describes relevant advances in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) with emphasis on particular syndromes and the impact of antibodies against surface antigens in their management. Recent findings PNS may present with symptoms that do not raise the suspicion of a paraneoplastic origin. The best example is anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis that in adult women frequently associates with ovarian teratoma. An electroencephalogram pattern described as 'extreme delta brush' was recently identified in 30% of patients with this disorder. Isolated myelopathy may have a paraneoplastic origin associated with amphiphysin or CV2 (CRMP5) antibodies. Jaw dystonia and laryngospasm can be the predominant symptom of the brainstem encephalitis associated with Ri antibodies. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)(B) receptor antibodies are the most common antibodies found in patients with limbic encephalitis and small cell lung cancer, and contactin- associated protein 2 antibodies in patients with Morvan's syndrome and thymoma. Lastly, a recent study identified delta/notch- like epidermal growth factor-related receptor (DNER) as the target antigen of Tr antibodies, a marker of cerebellar ataxia and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Summary The number of antibodies relevant to PNS is now expanded to those against surface antigens. These antibodies do not confirm the paraneoplastic origin of the syndrome but predict a better response to immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据