4.5 Article

Oligodendrocyte differentiation and implantation: new insights for remyelinating cell therapy

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 607-614

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32830f1e50

关键词

cell implantation; differentiation; neural stem cell; oligodendrocyte precursor cell

资金

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation [04-544 MS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Recent research on oligodendrocyte development has yielded new insights on the involvement of morphogens and differentiation factors in oligodendrogenesis. This knowledge has improved strategies to control neural stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte differentiation and functional maturation in vitro. In this review, we highlight the current knowledge on oligodendrocyte differentiation and discuss the novel possibilities of neural stem cell-derived oligodendrocytes for graft-based remyelination therapy, for example, for multiple sclerosis. Recent findings Detailed insight into the cellular and molecular processes of embryonic and adult oligodendrogenesis has extended considerably in the past 2 years. Application of extrinsic factors and manipulation of intrinsic factors in neural stem cells have yielded convincing oligodendrocyte differentiation strategies. In addition, the recent groundbreaking developments regarding induced pluripotent stem cells generated from easily accessible somatic cells seem to offer an almost inexhaustible source for transplantable, autologous neural stem cells. Moreover, new approaches to optimize the implantation site for oligodendrocyte survival and functionality have improved the feasibility of stem cell-based oligodendrocyte replacement therapy. Summary Loss of myelin in demyelinating diseases is only partly restored by endogenous oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Application of optimally functional, neural stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte precursors at the lesion site has become a realistic therapeutic approach to promote the remyelination process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据