4.2 Review

Biomarkers in acute and chronic kidney disease

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3282f4e525

关键词

acute kidney injury; acute renal failure; biomarkers; chronic kidney disease; cystatin C; neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK069749, R21DK070163, R01DK058872] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL08676] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK55388, R01 DK-58872, R01 DK069749, R21 DK070163] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The paucity of early, predictive, noninvasive biomarkers has impaired our ability to institute potentially effective therapies for acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease in a timely manner. Recent findings Promising novel biomarkers for acute kidney injury include a plasma panel (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and cystatin Q and a urine panel (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, interleukin-18, and kidney injury molecule-1). For chronic kidney disease, these include a similar plasma panel and a urine panel (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, asymetric dimethylarginine, and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein). The biomarker panels will probably be useful for assessing the duration and severity of kidney disease, and for predicting progression and adverse clinical outcomes, It is also likely that the biomarker panels will help to distinguish between the various etiologies of acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease. Summary The tools of functional genomics and proteomics have provided us with promising novel biomarkers for acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. It will be important in future studies to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these biomarker panels in clinical samples from large cohorts and in multiple clinical situations. Such studies will be facilitated by the availability of commercial tools for reproducible measurement of these panels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据