4.3 Review

LOX-1: a multiligand receptor at the crossroads of response to danger signals

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 439-445

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e32835688e4

关键词

danger signals; endothelial cells; LOX-1; oxidized LDL

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  3. Japan Vascular Disease Research Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390051] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review LOX-1 is a multiligand receptor implicated in endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis, although it was originally identified as an oxidized LDL receptor. In this review, the roles of various LOX-1 ligands and their interaction with LOX-1 are discussed to understand the pathophysiological significance of LOX-1. Recent findings LOX-1 knockout mice showed resistance of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation against oxidized LDL and retardation of atherosclerosis progression. LOX-1 ligand reduction in mice also attenuated atherosclerosis progression. In a human cohort study, high concentration of apoB-containing LOX-1 ligands predicted the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, modified HDL, which existed in high concentration in the plasma of coronary artery disease patients, was found to induce impairment of endothelial nitric oxide release via LOX-1. In addition to lipoproteins, LOX-1 was found to work as a C-reactive protein receptor providing a scaffold for the activation of the complement system. Summary LOX-1 is a unique molecule among the sensors of danger signals. LOX-1 is not only sensing danger signals such as modified LDL and heat shock protein, but also scaffolding other danger sensors including C-reactive protein and C1q, and directly commanding responses to danger signals by working as a cell adhesion molecule. Via these functions, LOX-1 might work as a surveillance molecule of vascular homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据