4.3 Review

Healthcare-associated infections and their prevention after extensive flooding

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 359-365

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283630b1d

关键词

black water; cross infection; floods; hospital; infection control; infections

资金

  1. National Research University Project of the Thailand Office of Higher Education Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewThis review will focus on the epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) after extensive blackwater flooding as well as preventive measures.Recent findingsThere is evidence suggesting an increased incidence of HAIs and pseudo-outbreaks due to molds after extensive flooding in healthcare facilities. However, there is no strong evidence of an increased incidence of typical nosocomial infections (i.e., ventilator-associated pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infection and catheter-associated urinary tract infections). The prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms may decrease after extensive flooding, due to repeated and thorough environmental cleaning prior to re-opening hospitals. Contamination of hospital water sources by enteric Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Aeromonas species), Legionella species and nontuberculous Mycobacterium species in flood-affected hospitals has been reported. Surveillance is an important initial step to detect potential outbreaks/pseudo-outbreaks of HAIs. Hospital preparedness policies before extensive flooding, particularly with environmental cleaning and mold remediation, are key to reducing the risk of flood-related HAIs. These policies are still lacking in most hospitals in countries that have experienced or are at risk for extensive flooding, which argues for nationwide policies to strengthen preparedness planning.SummaryAdditional studies are needed to evaluate the epidemiology of flood-related HAIs and the optimal surveillance and control methods following extensive flooding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据