4.3 Review

Understanding the significance of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia in babies and children

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 208-216

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328337fecb

关键词

biofilm; neonates; nosocomial infections; sepsis; Staphylococcus epidermidis

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This article provides an overview of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia/sepsis and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infections in neonates and children. Recent findings The incidence of S. epidermidis and CoNS sepsis in neonates is still very high and preventing and treating disease remains difficult. There has been recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of S. epidermidis infection, interaction of S. epidermidis with host defenses, and risk factors for the development of S. epidermidis disease. For example, we have gained more insight into the development of biofilm-associated catheter infections, which are responsible for recurrent CoNS infections in hospitalized premature neonates and are especially difficult to treat owing to intrinsic resistance of biofilms to antibiotics. Summary Biofilm-associated catheter infections by S. epidermidis occur frequently in neonates and adults. S. epidermidis bloodstream infections are particularly problematic in neonates. Prophylaxis in the form of eradicating colonizing S. epidermidis may be a double-edged sword, as S. epidermidis colonization may be beneficial to the host. New drugs may arise from a better understanding of S. epidermidis virulence and analysis of risk factors may help identify neonates susceptible to bacterial sepsis. However, reducing morbidity should always begin by increasing hygiene in hospital settings to reduce the introduction of potentially harmful opportunistic pathogens such as S. epidermidis on indwelling medical devices or during surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据