4.3 Review

New understandings on the pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 217-223

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328337f49e

关键词

daptomycin; rifampicin; roscovitine; Streptococcus pneumoniae

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungs-Gemeinschaft
  2. Else Kroener-Fresenius-Foundation
  3. Meningitis Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Currently, dexamethasone is the only adjuvant of proven benefit in bacterial meningitis. Dexamethasone halves the risk of poor outcome, but only in selected patient groups. New therapies based upon an understanding of the pathophysiology are needed. This article summarizes our knowledge on the pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis with special emphasis on pneumococcal meningitis, the experimentally best characterized subtype. Recent findings Experimental studies made clear that the harmful inflammatory reaction is initiated by the interaction of bacterial products with host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors. PRR signalling leads to MyD88-dependent production of proinflammatory cytokines of the interleukin-1 family. Secretion of interleukin-1 family cytokines forms a positive feedback loop that boosts MyD88-dependent production of proinflammatory mediators. As a consequence, great numbers of neutrophils are recruited to the subarachnoid space. Activated neutrophils release many potentially cytotoxic agents including oxidants and matrix metalloproteinases that can cause collateral damage to brain tissue. Additionally to the inflammatory response, direct bacterial cytotoxicity has been identified as a contributor to tissue damage. Summary Promising pathophysiologically targeted approaches for adjunctive therapy of acute bacterial meningitis include limiting the release of toxic bacterial products (e. g. nonbacteriolytic antibiotics) and interfering in the generation of host-derived cytotoxins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据