4.3 Review

Genetics of susceptibility to infection with enteric pathogens

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 471-476

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283304eb6

关键词

diarrhea; enteric infections; genetic susceptibility; single nucleotide polymorphisms

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024148, UL1 RR024148-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI054948, R01 AI054948-05] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024148] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI054948] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review examines recent developments in human genetic susceptibility to enteropathogens that cause infectious diarrhea. Recent findings The affinity of specific norovirus genogroups to different histoblood group antigens (HBGAs) on secretor cells has been studied in different epidemiologic studies. HBGAs are also used as receptors by Vibrio cholerae with different degrees of affinity between biotypes. Polymorphisms in the CD14, lactoferrin and osteoprotegerin promoter genes were associated to diarrhea in travelers. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IL-8 genes are also associated to increased risk for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and Clostridium difficile infection. IL-10 haplotypes were associated to enterotoxigenic E coli associated diarrhea in exposed individuals. A family-based study showed a significant association of the LPLUNC1 gene and cholera. The major histocompatibility complex class II antigens are associated to different degrees of susceptibility and resistance to Salmonella, Cryptosporidium and Entamoeba infection. Summary Variants in genes that encode molecules that mediate attachment, pathogen recognition, inflammatory cytokine response, innate and acquired immunity are being identified as determinants of host genetic susceptibility to infectious diarrhea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据