4.2 Article

Managing imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 97-103

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3283366bcb

关键词

chronic myeloid leukaemia; dasatinib; imatinib; kinase domain mutations; nilotinib; tyrosine kinase inhibitor

资金

  1. Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Imatinib mesylate has proven to be an extremely effective and generally well tolerated drug, producing durable responses in most patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nonetheless, a minority of patients are resistant or intolerant to imatinib; proposed alternative strategies include imatinib dose escalation, switching to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor or, in rare instances, allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The aim of this review is to aid clinicians in the recognition, investigation and appropriate treatment of imatinib resistance. Recent findings Although response definitions are still being refined, there is emerging evidence that earlier intervention with next-line therapy is associated with better outcomes, reinforcing the importance of careful monitoring in all patients and mutation analysis in those losing response. Imatinib dose escalation can produce sustained responses in patients resistant to standard dosing, but is frequently poorly tolerated. Dasatinib and nilotinib are both effective next-line therapies, with clinical studies confirming a small number of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations that confer insensitivity to one or both of these agents. Summary The development of imatinib resistance, as defined by the revised European LeukemiaNet criteria, should trigger a careful review of drug adherence or recent interruptions, a repeat bone marrow aspirate and mutation analysis. In the absence of clinically relevant mutations, the choice between dasatinib and nilotinib should be guided by the potential adverse effects specific to each drug and relevant comorbidities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据