4.2 Article

Impact of new prognostic markers in treatment decisions in acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 98-104

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3283257adb

关键词

acute myeloid leukemia; all-trans retinoic acid; FLT3-internal tandem duplication; nucleophosmin; predictive markers

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01G19981, 01KG0605]
  2. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [DJCLS R06/06v]
  3. Else Kroner-Fresenius-Stiftung [P38/05//A49/05//F03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review In recent years, new molecular markers have emerged as significant prognostic parameters and as potential targets for molecularly targeted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, prognostic markers cannot guide the decision for a specific treatment, as they are associated with a differential outcome regardless of the given treatment. In contrast, predictive markers indicate a treatment benefit in patients that are characterized through these markers. Thus, predictive markers can guide clinical decision-making. Recent findings In young adults, mutations of the nucleophosmin (gene gNPM1(mut)) in the absence of concurrent FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) (FLT3-ITDneg) have impressive prognostic and, beyond prognostication, predictive properties. This NPM1(mut)/FLT3-ITDneg genotype predicts equivalent favorable outcome after intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, whereas in the absence of this marker clinical outcome was significantly improved after an allogeneic transplantation. In addition, within a retrospective study performed on older adults, the same genotype predicted a significantly improved outcome if all-trans retinoic acid was added to intensive chemotherapy. Summary The discovery of new prognostic and predictive markers has increased our understanding of leukemogenesis and this may lead to improved prognostication and, more important, to novel genotype-specific treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据