4.7 Article

Distinct Mechanisms Underlie Quiescence during Two Caenorhabditis elegans Sleep-Like States

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 35, 期 43, 页码 14571-14584

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1369-15.2015

关键词

C. elegans; invertebrate; neural circuit; optogenetics; sleep

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440]
  2. NIH [T32-HL-07953, R01-NS-084835, R01-NS-088432, R21-NS-091500, R01-NS-064030]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrophysiological recordings have enabled identification of physiologically distinct yet behaviorally similar states of mammalian sleep. In contrast, sleep in nonmammals has generally been identified behaviorally and therefore regarded as a physiologically uniform state characterized by quiescence of feeding and locomotion, reduced responsiveness, and rapid reversibility. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans displays sleep-like quiescent behavior under two conditions: developmentally timed quiescence (DTQ) occurs during larval transitions, and stress-induced quiescence (SIQ) occurs in response to exposure to cellular stressors. Behaviorally, DTQ and SIQ appear identical. Here, we use optogenetic manipulations of neuronal and muscular activity, pharmacology, and genetic perturbations to uncover circuit and molecular mechanisms of DTQ and SIQ. We find that locomotion quiescence induced by DTQ- and SIQ-associated neuropeptides occurs via their action on the nervous system, although their neuronal target(s) and/or molecular mechanisms likely differ. Feeding quiescence during DTQ results from a loss of pharyngeal muscle excitability, whereas feeding quiescence during SIQ results from a loss of excitability in the nervous system. Together these results indicate that, as in mammals, quiescence is subserved by different mechanisms during distinct sleep-like states in C. elegans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据