4.1 Review

Global progress towards eliminating gastrointestinal helminth infections

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 18-24

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000025

关键词

food-borne trematode; liver fluke infection; mass drug administration; neglected tropical diseases; soil-transmitted helminth

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  3. European Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewTo highlight the gastrointestinal helminths in the context of renewed global commitment to control or eliminate neglected tropical diseases in the coming decade.Recent findingsTwo key documents, namely the 2012 London Declaration for Neglected Tropical Diseases and the 2013 World Health Assembly resolution, emphasize the importance of mass drug administration (MDA) for controlling several key neglected tropical diseases. These documents, together with the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, establish the major gastrointestinal helminth infections, including the soil-transmitted helminthiases - ascariasis, trichuriasis, hookworm, and strongyloidiasis - in addition to the intestinal and liver fluke infections, as some of the most important gastrointestinal infections of humankind. Current MDA approaches using single-dose albendazole or mebendazole are effective for ascariasis, less so for other soil-transmitted helminth infections. Expanded use of albendazole in combination with ivermectin would ensure improved drug efficacies against trichuriasis and strongyloidiasis. There is no effective elimination strategy for targeting hookworm and liver and intestinal fluke infections through current MDA approaches.SummaryThe global community must expand current MDA efforts, while simultaneously developing additional drugs, diagnostics, and vaccines alongside better utilizing transmission dynamics and modeling, if it is to successfully meet the goals and targets established by policymakers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据