4.1 Article

Microbial influences on the small intestinal response to radiation injury

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 88-94

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283361927

关键词

antibiotic; innate immune; microbiome; probiotic; radiation enteritis; radiation enteropathy

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  2. Global Probiotics Council's Young Investigator Grant
  3. National Institutes of Health [T-32 DK07737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Injury to the small bowel from ionizing radiation occurs commonly in patients undergoing cancer therapy and less commonly in instances of accidental radiation overexposure. Several lines of evidence now suggest that dynamic interactions between the host's enteric microbiota and innate immune system are important in modulating the intestinal response to radiation. Here, we will review recent developments in the area of acute radiation enteropathy and examine the current state of knowledge regarding the impact of host-microbial interactions in the process. Recent findings There is promise in the development and testing of new clinical biomarkers including serum citrulline. Toll-like receptor agonists and innate immune system signaling pathways including nuclear factor-kappa B profoundly alter intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis and crypt survival after radiation exposure. Germ-free conditions, probiotics and antibiotics are each identified as modifiers of disease development and course. A human study suggested that luminal microbiota composition may influence the host's intestinal response to radiation and may change in those developing postradiation diarrhea. Summary New knowledge implies that investigations aimed at deciphering the microbiome-host interactions before and after small bowl radiation injury may eventually allow prediction of disease course and offer opportunities for the development of novel therapeutic or prophylactic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据