4.1 Article

Gastroduodenal mucosal defense

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 604-610

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833f1222

关键词

heat shock proteins; Helicobacter pylori; prostaglandins; proteinase-activated receptors; purinergic signalling; toll-like receptors; trefoil factors

资金

  1. NIH/NIDDK [RO1 DK54221, P30 DK0413]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review We have summarized recent findings related to gastroduodenal mucosal defense as well as factors contributing to defensive failure, highlighting findings that illuminate new pathophysiological mechanisms. Recent findings Gastroduodenal bicarbonate secretion is mediated by prostaglandin E receptors and stimulated by the prostone lubiprostone. Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 signaling is protective against gastric injury. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) is a chemosensor that regulates the duodenal mucosal surface pH. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increases gastric permeability; IAP secreted during fat digestion may detoxify colonic LPS. NADPH oxidase activity mediates ischemia/reperfusion-related gastric mucosal damage. Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) protects the gastric mucosa through inhibition of apoptosis, proinflammatory cytokines, and cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). HSP90 may be a contributing factor in impaired adaptive cytoprotection. Proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) is protective against Helicobacter-induced gastritis, mediated by the suppression of proinflammatory pathways. IKK beta/NF-kappa B signaling decreases chronic Helicobacter-induced inflammation by inhibiting cellular apoptosis and necrosis. Activation of A(2A) adenosine receptors decreases inflammation and gastritis but leads to persistent Helicobacter pylori infection. Summary Enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of gastroduodenal defense and injury provides new insight into potential therapeutic targets, contributing towards the development of better tolerated and more effective therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据