4.1 Article

Molecular and cellular regulation of pancreatic duct cell function

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 447-453

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832e06ce

关键词

bicarbonate secretion; cystic fibrosis; cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; fluid secretion; pancreatitis

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Cystic Fibrosis Trust (UK)
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The pancreatic duct epithelium is remarkable for its capacity to secrete HCO(3)(-) ions at concentrations as high as 140 mmol/l. The properties of the key transporters involved in this process and the central role played by cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) are the main focus of this review. Recent findings The Cl(-)/HCO(3)(-) exchanger at the apical membrane of pancreatic duct cells is now known to be SLC26A6. The 1 : 2 stoichiometry and electrogenicity of this exchanger enable it to contribute to the secretion of HCO(3)(-) at high concentrations. The apical CFTR channels also appear to have sufficient HCO(3)(-) permeability to contribute directly to HCO(3)(-) secretion. There is a strong possibility that the Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) channels at the apical membrane are members of the bestrophin family which, like CFTR, are also permeable to HCl More has been learned about the complex interactions between CFTR and other transporters within macromolecular complexes coordinated at the apical membrane by scaffolding proteins. Further details are also emerging of the protective paracrine roles of nucleotides, nucleosides, bile acids and trypsin in the regulation of ductal secretion. Summary Most of the key transporters involved in Cl(-) and HCO(3)(-) secretion have now been identified and characterized. Current research focuses on the molecular interactions between these transporters and the ways in which they are regulated by extracellular signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据