4.3 Review

Hypoxia signaling during intestinal ischemia and inflammation

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 178-185

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283514bd0

关键词

A2BAR; adenosine receptor; HIF; hypoxia-inducible factor; netrin-1; PHD; prolyl hydroxylase

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL0921, R01-DK083385, R01HL098294]
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA)
  3. Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF)
  4. American Heart Association (AHA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review During critical illness, alterations of intestinal blood supply and inflammatory activation can result in severe intestinal hypoxia (limited oxygen availability). Conditions of hypoxia lead to the activation of a transcriptional program that is under the control of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). In many instances, HIF-dependent alterations of gene expression represent endogenous adaptive responses that dampen pathologic inflammation and could be targeted to treat intestinal injury. Recent findings Post-translational stabilization of the HIF transcription factor and corresponding changes in gene expression are central to the resolution of intestinal injury. Examples for such responses that we discuss in this review include hypoxia-elicited increases in extracellular adenosine production and signaling, particularly through the A2B adenosine receptor, and intestinal protection provided by hypoxia-inducible netrin-1. Summary The present review focuses on HIF-elicited anti-inflammatory pathways that result in intestinal protection during critical illness. Many of these pathways represent novel therapeutic targets for attenuating multiorgan failure and critical illness. Whereas these therapeutic approaches are currently being investigated in cell culture models or in genetic mouse models, we are optimistic that at least some of these novel targets can be translated from bench to bedside in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据