4.3 Review

Hyperoxia: good or bad for the injured brain?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 167-171

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f57552

关键词

cerebral metabolism; head injury; hyperoxia; oxygen

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P01NS035966, P50NS035966] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS035966-09, P01 NS035966, NS035966] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review For decades it was assumed that cerebral ischemia was a major cause of secondary brain injury in traumatic brain injury, and management focused on improving cerebral perfusion and blood flow. Following the observation of mitochondrial dysfunction in traumatic brain injury and the widespread use of brain tissue oxygen tension (PbrO2) monitoring, however, recent work has focused on the use of hyperoxia to reduce the impact of traumatic brain injury. Recent findings Previous work on normobaric hyperoxia utilized very indirect measures of cerebral oxygen metabolism (intracranial pressure, brain oxygen tension and microdialysis) as outcome variables. Interpretation of these measures is controversial, making it difficult to determine the impact of hyperoxia. A recent study, however, utilized positron emission tomography to study the impact of hyperoxia on patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury and found no improvement on cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen with this intervention. Summary Despite suggestive data from microdialysis studies, direct measurement of the ability of the brain to utilize oxygen indicates that hyperoxia does not increase oxygen utilization. This, combined with the real risk of oxygen toxicity, suggests that routine clinical use is not appropriate at this time and should await appropriate prospective outcome studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据