4.6 Review

Liquid crystalline filamentous biological colloids: Analogies and differences

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.08.004

关键词

Colloid; Liquid crystal; Chirality; Self-assembly; Virus; Nanocellulose; Amyloid

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PZ00P2_168023/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_168023] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid fibrils, nanocellulose and filamentous viruses are three important families of filamentous biological colloids exhibiting a rich phase behavior in two and three dimensions. Similarly to the entropy-driven crystallization of hard spheres into crystals, also in their case entropy triggers order-order transitions at increasing concentrations, but their high aspect ratio, semi flexible and chiral nature bring additional complexity to the phase diagram and in some cases, system-specific features. Some of the differences among these three classes of filamentous colloids arise from their own constitutive nature and their mesoscopic structure; however, other features are universally shared among them and can be understood by applying general liquid crystal theories in bulk or confined geometries. In this manuscript we review the main analogies and differences among these three classes of biological filamentous colloids, starting from a discussion on their chemical composition and progressing across length scales to discuss first their mesoscopic structure and then their colloidal behavior, with particular emphasis to their lyotropic liquid crystalline features. By doing so, we highlight the main tools available to tune the colloidal properties, from the onset of the isotropic-nematic transition and the width of its biphasic region, to the shape transformations and director field distribution in the ensued liquid crystalline droplets, to the way chirality is transferred from the constitutive colloidal particles to the final macroscopic liquid crystalline phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据