4.2 Review

Cytokines: muscle protein and amino acid metabolism

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32834e6ea2

关键词

amino acids; critical illness; endotoxin; IL-6; muscle breakdown; muscle synthesis; proteolysis; sepsis; TNF-alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review highlights the role of cytokines, in particular tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), in relation to the nature of human in-vivo muscle wasting in disease. Recent findings Infusion of human TNF-alpha and IL-6 in healthy individuals, acutely raises TNF-alpha and IL-6 to moderate levels, has only identified IL-6 as a potent cytokine, decreasing systemic amino acid levels and muscle protein metabolism. The marked decrease in circulatory and muscle amino acid concentrations was observed with a concomitant reduction in both the rates of muscle protein synthesis and breakdown, that is, reduced turnover with a minor increase in net muscle degradation. Very similar observations have been made in models of acute inflammation, induced by high-dose endotoxin injection. However, these changes were suggested not to be attributed to a direct effect of IL-6 on the regulation of muscle protein metabolism but indirectly via IL-6 reducing amino acid availability. Summary Recent studies suggest that the best described cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-6 are unlikely to be the major direct mediators of muscle protein loss in inflammatory diseases. However, these cytokines can initiate important changes in secondary mediators and/or clinical complications that need correction therapies causing muscle wasting. Moreover, the general view from animal work is that in muscle wasting the rate of muscle protein synthesis is decreased and the rate of breakdown is increased. However, this does not seem applicable for inflammatory diseases or human models of sepsis, in which the enhanced imbalance between these two processes is observed within an enhanced, normal or reduced muscle protein turnover.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据