4.2 Article

Interaction of oxidative stress, astrocyte swelling and cerebral ammonia toxicity

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328333b829

关键词

astrocytes; hepatic encephalopathy; NADPH oxidase; protein tyrosine nitration; RNA oxidation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgerneinschaft through Sonderforschungsbereich 575 'Experimentelle Hepatologie' (Dusseldorf)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Description of the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of cerebral ammonia toxicity and hepatic encephalopathy. Recent findings Ammonia plays a key role in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy which, manifests as a neuropsychiatric syndrome accompanying acute and chronic liver failure. One consequence of ammonia action on the brain is astrocyte swelling, which triggers the generation of oxidative/nitrosative stress at the level of NADPH oxidase, nitric oxide synthases and the mitochondria. A self-amplifying signaling loop between oxidative stress and astrocyte swelling has been proposed. Consequences of the ammonia-induced oxidative/nitrosative stress response are protein modifications through nitration of tyrosine residues and oxidation of astrocytic and neuronal RNA. Nitrosative stress also mobilizes zinc from intracellular stores with impact on gene expression. These alterations may at least in part mediate cerebral ammonia toxicity through disturbances of intracellular and intercellular signaling and of synaptic plasticity. Summary Oxidative/nitrosative stress and a low-grade cerebral edema as key events in the pathogenesis of ammonia toxicity and hepatic encephalopathy may offer potential new strategies for treatment. Ammonia-induced oxidation of RNA and proteins may impair postsynaptic protein synthesis, which is critically involved in learning and memory consolidation. RNA oxidation offers a novel explanation for multiple disturbances of neurotransmitter systems and gene expression and the cognitive deficits observed in hepatic encephalopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据