4.5 Review

Abiotic synthesis of RNA in water: a common goal of prebiotic chemistry and bottom-up synthetic biology

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 146-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.09.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1004570]
  2. NASA Astrobiology Program, under the NSF Center for Chemical Evolution [CHE-1004570]
  3. NASA Exobiology Program [NNX13AI02G]
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1004570] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. NASA [NNX13AI02G, 473676] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For more than half a century chemists have searched for a plausible prebiotic synthesis of RNA. The initial advances of the 1960s and 1970s were followed by decades of measured progress and a growing pessimism about overcoming remaining challenges. Fortunately, the past few years have provided a number of important advances, including new abiotic routes for the synthesis of nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides. Recent discoveries also provide additional support for the hypothesis that RNA is the product of evolution, being preceded by ancestral genetic polymers, or pre-RNAs, that are synthesized more easily than RNA. In some cases, parallel searches for plausible prebiotic routes to RNA and pre-RNAs have provided more than one experimentally verified synthesis of RNA substructures and possible predecessors. Just as the synthesis of a contemporary biological molecule cannot be understood without knowledge of cellular metabolism, it is likely that an integrated approach that takes into account both plausible prebiotic reactions and plausible prebiotic environments will ultimately provide the most satisfactory and unifying chemical scenarios for the origin of nucleic acids. In this context, recent advances towards the abiotic synthesis of RNA and candidates for pre-RNAs are beginning to suggest that some molecules (e.g., urea) were multi-faceted contributors to the origin of nucleic acids, and the origin of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据