4.1 Review

Has pharmacogenetics brought us closer to 'personalized medicine' for initial drug treatment of hypertension?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 333-339

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32832c58ba

关键词

antihypertensive pharmacogenetics; genes; hypertension; personalized medicine

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the United States National Institutes of Health [HL63082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review To describe recent advances in anti hypertensive pharmacogenetics and discuss challenges related to translating this knowledge into 'personalized medicine' for the initial drug treatment of hypertension. Recent findings Recent studies included both prospective and retrospective analyses ranging from small clinical investigations of 42 participants to large, multicenter, randomized, outcome-based clinical trials of nearly 40000 individuals. Treatment with drugs from five classes of antihypertensives was evaluated in these studies. The duration of treatment ranged from week-long follow up for blood pressure response to a decade-long follow up for clinical outcomes. In total, associations with 12 different candidate genes were assessed. These studies present the now familiar mixture of significant and nonsignificant pharmacogenetic findings that are sometimes consistent with, sometimes inconsistent with, previous findings in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics. Summary Recent research in anti hypertensive pharmacogenetics has added to the existing evidence base, and novel genes and variants as well as new methodologies are cause for continued optimism. However, translation of genomic science to clinical settings has not kept pace with growing interest in personalized medicine for hypertension. New research paradigms may be needed to translate pharmacogenetics into clinical tools. Clinical application will also require a trained clinical workforce, validated genetic tests, and payers willing to fund pretreatment testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据