4.1 Review

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults with congenital heart disease: distinct differences from other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension and management implications

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 545-554

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283126954

关键词

advanced therapies; congenital heart disease; pulmonary hypertension

资金

  1. European Society of Cardiology
  2. Hellenic Cardiological Society
  3. Propondis' Foundation
  4. Cardiological Society of Northern Greece
  5. Clinical Research Committee
  6. Royal Brompton Hospital
  7. London and the British Heart Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review To present the available data on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, prognosis, and especially management strategies for adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHID) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Particular emphasis is placed on differences between other types of PAH and CHD-related PAH, in which clinical presentation and management relate to a constellation of factors, both pulmonary and cardiac. Recent findings Pulmonary vascular disease in adults with CHID and especially its extreme expression, the Eisenmenger syndrome, is a chronic disease with slow progression, leading to multiorgan failure and death, decades after its first clinical presentation. In the last few years, oral advanced therapies for PAH have emerged and are considered for mono or combination therapy for CHD, though the evidence is limited. Supportive care and prevention of complications seem to be at least as important in the overall care of these patients. Summary Although new advanced therapies hold promise in PAH secondary to CHD, long-term data are clearly needed. Advanced therapies should be considered when other causes of functional limitation, such as iron deficiency, have been first addressed. Expertise in CHD as well as PAH is essential for providing adequate care for this patient group with a unique pathophysiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据