4.7 Article

Interaction of Insular Cortex and Ventral Striatum Mediates the Effect of Incentive Memory on Choice Between Goal-Directed Actions

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 35, 期 16, 页码 6464-6471

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4153-14.2015

关键词

goal-directed action; gustatory cortex; nucleus accumbens; outcome devaluation; value-based decision-making

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health-National Institutes of Health [MH56446]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [633267]
  3. Australian Research Council (Laureate Fellowship) [FL0992409]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anterior insular cortex (IC) and the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core have been separately implicated in the selection and performance of actions based on the incentive value of the instrumental outcome. Here, we examined the role of connections between the IC and the NAc core in the performance of goal-directed actions. Rats were trained on two actions for distinct outcomes, after which one of the two outcomes was devalued by specific satiety immediately before a choice extinction test. We first confirmed the projection from the IC to the NAc core and then disconnected these structures via asymmetrical excitotoxic lesions before training. Contralateral, but not ipsilateral, disconnection of the IC and NAc core disrupted outcome devaluation. We hypothesized that communication between the IC and NAc core is necessary for the retrieval of incentive value at test. To test this, we infused the GABA(A) agonist muscimol into the IC and the mu-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP into the contralateral NAc before the choice extinction test. As expected, inactivation of the IC in one hemisphere and blocking mu-opioid receptors in the contralateral NAc core abolished outcome-selective devaluation. These results suggest that the IC and NAc core form part of a circuit mediating the retrieval of outcome values and the subsequent choice between goal-directed actions based on those values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据