4.1 Review

Omenn syndrome does not live by V(D)J recombination alone

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32834c311a

关键词

inflammation; Omenn syndrome; severe combined immunodeficiency; V(D)J recombination

资金

  1. Italian Telethon Foundation
  2. Fondazione CARIPLO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review During the past decade, easy access to sequence analyses has allowed us to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of severe combined immunodeficiencies. Here, we describe the expanding clinical and immunological spectrum associated with Omenn syndrome phenotype. In particular, we review the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of 'classical' Omenn syndrome due to the recombination activating gene (RAG) defects and of a new subgroup of Omenn-like disorders. Recent findings Different types of mutations are associated with the Omenn phenotype characterized by skin erythroderma, oligoclonal-activated T cells and elevated IgE in the absence of circulating B cells. Extensive studies conducted over the last few years have allowed the definition of the 'classical form' of Omenn syndrome due to hypomorphic defects in genes involved in V(D)J recombination, mainly RAG genes, and 'Omenn-like' features associated with mutations in genes involved in the maturation steps of lymphoid cells other than V(D)J recombination. Moreover, an increasing number of diseases other than those due to V(D)J recombination defects develop Omenn signs. Summary Impaired but not abolished V(D)J recombination process leads to the generation of a few T cells which expand in the periphery, infiltrate target organs such as skin and gut, resulting in severe erythroderma and colitis, both typical signs of Omenn syndrome. Extensive molecular studies now demonstrate that genes other than V(D)J molecules have a role in the pathogenesis of this disease, supporting the evidence that 'Omenn' defines an inflammatory condition associated with various genetic defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据