4.1 Review

DNA-PKcs deficiency in human: long predicted, finally found

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283327e41

关键词

DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit; DNA double strand break repair; nonhomologous end joining; PRKDC; severe combined immunodeficiency; V(D)J recombination

资金

  1. Dutch Organization for Scientific Research [916.56.107]
  2. European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review To describe new immunological and molecular findings of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) as a new candidate gene for radiosensitive T-B-severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), which has implications for the diagnostic strategy of T-B-SCID. Recent findings The first human mutation in the gene encoding DNA-PKcs (PRKDC) has been identified in a radiosensitive T-B-SCID patient. A mutation in the DNA-PKcs gene has been predicted for a long time, but spontaneous mutations had only been identified in mouse, horse and dog models. Summary DNA-PKcs is a key player in the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double strand break repair. Correct V(D)J recombination of T cell receptor and immunoglobulin genes is fully dependent on NHEJ, as it is involved in the formation of coding and signal joints. Therefore, a NHEJ defect results in absence of T and B cells. The DNA-PKcs deficient patient presented as a classical SCID patient, not different from a recombination activating gene or Artemis deficiency. The mutation concerned a hypomorphic missense mutation (L3062R) that did not result in absence of protein expression nor in deficient in vivo or in vitro (auto) phosphorylation. Although mutated DNA-PKcs was still able to recruit Artemis to the site of DNA damage, it was probably defective in Artemis activation. In the spontaneous animal models, however, the kinase activity was completely lost, which is essentially different from the human mutation. This observation suggests that some aspects of the DNA-PKcs function are unique to humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据