4.4 Review

Bone-targeted agents and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: the state of the art

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 259-268

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3747/co.19.1011

关键词

Breast cancer; bone metastases; skeletal-related events; bisphosphonates; denosumab

类别

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Novartis
  3. Roche
  4. Amgen Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most women with advanced breast cancer will develop bone metastases, which are associated with the development of skeletal-related events (SRES) such as pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression. This article reviews the evolving definition and incidence of SRES, the pathophysiology of bone metastases, and the key evidence for the safety an efficacy of the currently available systemic treatment options for preventing and delaying SRES in the setting of breast cancer with bone metastases. The bisphosphonates are structural analogues of endogenous pyrophosphate; three of them (clodronate, pamidronate, and zoledronate) are currently approved for use in Canada in the setting of breast cancer with bone metastases. Denosumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody that binds to human RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand), thereby preventing osteoclast formation, function, and survival, and reducing cancer-induced destruction of bone. Denosumab has recently been approved in Canada for reducing the risk of SRES from the bone metastases associated with a variety of malignancies, including breast cancer. How to predict the patients that will benefit most from prophylactic treatment, the agents to select and the timing of switches between agents, the dosing schedules and duration. of treatment to choose, the potential utility of the agents in the adjuvant setting, and the utility of additional endpoints such as markers of bone resorption are among the outstanding questions with h respect to the optimal use of anti-resorptive agents for patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据