4.3 Article

CDKN2A Loss Is Associated With Shortened Overall Survival in Lower-Grade (World Health Organization Grades II-III) Astrocytomas

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000188

关键词

Astrocytoma; ATRX; Biomarker; CDKN2A; IDH; Infiltrating glioma; Oligodendroglioma; p16; TP53

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA52689, P50CA097257, R01CA126831, R01CA139020, R25CA112355]
  2. National Brain Tumor Foundation
  3. Stanley D. Lewis and Virginia S. Lewis Endowed Chair in Brain Tumor Research
  4. Robert Magnin Newman Endowed Chair in Neuro-oncology
  5. National Center for Research Resources
  6. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health through University of California San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1 RR024131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lower-grade (World Health Organization Grades II and III) gliomas vary widely in clinical behavior and are classified as astrocytic, oligodendroglial, or mixed. Anaplasia depends greatly on mitotic activity, with CDKN2A loss considered as the most common mechanism for cell cycle dysregulation. We investigated whether loss of the CDKN2A gene is associated with overall survival across pathologically and genetically defined glioma subtypes. After adjustment for IDH mutation, sex, and age, CDKN2A deletion was strongly associated with poorer overall survival in astrocytomas but not in oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas. Molecular classification of astrocytomas by IDH mutation, TP53 mutation, and/or ATRX loss of expression revealed that CDKN2A loss in IDH/TP53 mutated tumors was strongly associated with worse overall survival. CDKN2A loss in IDH mutated tumors with ATRX loss was only weakly associated with worse overall survival. These findings suggest that CDKN2A testing may provide further clinical aid in lower-grade glioma substratification beyond IDH mutation and 1p19q codeletion status, particularly in IDH/TP53 mutated astrocytomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据