4.6 Review

CB1 Cannabinoid Receptors and their Associated Proteins

期刊

CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 17, 期 14, 页码 1382-1393

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/092986710790980023

关键词

Anandamide (arachidonylethanolamide); AP-3; 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG); beta-arrestin; CP55940; CRIP-1a; endocannabinoids; G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs); GASP; rimonabant (SR141716); Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); WIN55212-2

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA003690] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA003690, R01 DA003690-22] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CB1 receptors are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) abundant in neurons, in which they modulate neuro-transmission. The CB1 receptor influence on memory and learning is well recognized, and disease states associated with CB1 receptors are observed in addiction disorders, motor dysfunction, schizophrenia, and in bipolar, depression, and anxiety disorders. Beyond the brain, CB1 receptors also function in liver and adipose tissues, vascular as well as cardiac tissue, reproductive tissues and bone. Signal transduction by CB1 receptors occurs through interaction with Gi/o proteins to inhibit adenylyl cyclase, activate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), inhibit voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, activate K+ currents (K-ir), and influence nitric oxide (NO) signaling. CB1 receptors are observed in internal organelles as well as plasma membrane. beta-Arrestins, adaptor protein AP-3, and G-protein receptor-associated sorting protein 1 (GASP1) modulate cellular trafficking. Cannabinoid Receptor Interacting Protein1a (CRIP1a) is an accessory protein whose function has not been delineated. Factor Associated with Neutral sphingomyelinase (FAN) regulates ceramide signaling. Such diversity in cellular signaling and modulation by interacting proteins suggests that agonists and allosteric modulators could be developed to specifically regulate unique, cell type-specific responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据