4.3 Article

Therapeutic lipid target achievements among high and highest risk patients: results from the CEPHEUS study in the Arabian Gulf

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 2429-2435

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2014.965774

关键词

Apolipoprotein B; Arabs; Cardiovascular disease; Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Middle East; Triglycerides

资金

  1. Astra Zeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine lipid target achievements of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apo B) in the Centralized Pan-Middle East Survey on the undertreatment of hypercholesterolemia (CEPHEUS) in Arabian Gulf States patients with high and highest risk according to the joint Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACC). Methods: CEPHEUS was conducted in patients (>= 18 years of age) in six Middle Eastern countries between November 2009 and July 2010 on lipid lowering drugs (LLDs). Serum samples collected included total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides (TGs), apo B, and apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1). Results: The overall mean age of the cohort (n = 5275) was 56 +/- 13 years, 58% (n = 3060) were male and 69% (n = 3635) were highest risk. LDL-C target was achieved in 25%, non-HDL-C in 36% and apo B in 38% of patients in the highest risk cohort compared with LDL-C 46%, non-HDL-C 58% and apo B 51% in the high risk group. In patients with TGs >= 2.2 mmol/L, LDL-C target was achieved in 16% and apo B in 15% of patients in the highest risk group compared with LDL-C 32% and apo B 22% in the high risk cohort. Conclusion: Despite being on LLDs, a large proportion of high and highest risk patients in the Arabian Gulf are not at recommended lipid targets and remain at a substantial residual risk for cardiovascular diseases. Apo B may be used as an additional target in patients with triglycerides >= 2.2 mmol/L. The findings should be interpreted in light of the study's limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据