4.3 Review

What do we know about the safety of corticosteroids in rheumatoid arthritis?

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 1147-1160

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.818531

关键词

Corticosteroids; Observational research; Review; Rheumatoid arthritis; Safety

资金

  1. IBSA
  2. Merck Sharp Dohme
  3. Novartis
  4. Nutraveris
  5. Pfizer
  6. Rottapharm
  7. Servier
  8. Theramex
  9. Bayer
  10. Genevrier
  11. SMB
  12. Negma
  13. Lilly
  14. Wyeth
  15. Amgen
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Roche
  18. Merckle
  19. Nycomed
  20. NPS
  21. UCB
  22. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  23. Teijin
  24. Teva
  25. Ebewee Pharma
  26. Zodiac
  27. Analis
  28. Novo-Nordisk
  29. Nolver
  30. Bristol Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clear information is still lacking on the safety of corticosteroids (GCs) therapy in RA despite six decades of clinical experience. Scope: We performed a literature search in Ovid MEDLINE from January 2000 to December 2012. Our Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) strategy search was: rheumatoid arthritis [Population], corticosteroids or glucocorticoids [Intervention], any comparison [Comparator], adverse effects [Outcome]. Studies were selected if they reported any measure of association between GCs intake and potential adverse effects in RA patients. Findings: We identified 1030 papers and selected for analysis 26 observational studies and six systematic reviews. The major side effects of GCs in RA are bone loss, risk of cardiovascular events and risk of infections as evidenced by large observational studies and not necessarily RCTs. Others associations were reported with herpes zoster, tuberculosis, hyperglycemia, cutaneous abnormalities, gastrointestinal perforation, respiratory infection and self-reported health problems such as cushingoid phenotype, ecchymosis, parchment-like skin, epistaxis, weight gain and sleep disturbance. Other potential adverse effects of GCs were studied but no association was found. These included psychological disorders, dermatophytosis, brain diseases, interstitial lung disease, memory deficit, metabolic syndrome, lymphoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, renal function and cerebrovascular accidents. Most of the evidence emanates from observational researches and the inherent limitations of such data should be kept in mind. Conclusion: Recent observational data and systematic reviews suggest that GCs can lead to relatively alarming and burdensome side effects in RA. This is particularly true for patients who have longer term and higher dose therapies. GCs are largely used in RA and knowing their safety profile is essential to improve patients care. The design of new therapeutic strategies intended to minimize the daily dosing of GCs while conserving their beneficial effect should be encouraged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据