4.3 Article

Recommendations for an update of 2003 European regulatory requirements for registration of drugs to be used in the treatment of RA

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 315-325

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.542135

关键词

-

资金

  1. Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES)
  2. Abbott
  3. Amgen
  4. BMS
  5. Centocor
  6. Pfizer
  7. Roche
  8. Sanofi-Aventis
  9. Schering-Plough
  10. UCB
  11. Wyeth
  12. Novartis
  13. GSK
  14. Combinatorx
  15. Augurex
  16. Nitec
  17. Genentech
  18. Mundipharma
  19. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10299] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. Versus Arthritis
  21. Cancer Research UK [18475] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since 2003, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) document, 'Points to consider on clinical investigation of medicinal products other than NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis' has provided guidance for the clinical development of both biologic and non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). In the last few years, several new products have been developed or are in development for the treatment of RA, which offer significant efficacy with regard to disease control, including prevention of structural damage and disability. Concurrently, novel insights have been gained with respect to the assessment of disease activity, joint damage and disability. New treatment strategies have been established which relate to early therapy, tight control and rapid switching of medication. Accordingly, several new EULAR/ACR recommendations have been or are being developed. Several important additions and changes are needed in the 2003 guidance to incorporate the current scientific knowledge into clinical trial design for the development of future products. Under the auspices of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES), a group of experts in the field of RA and clinical trial design met to provide a consensus recommendation for an update to the 2003 EMA guidance document.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据