4.3 Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of a high-intensity statin compared to a low-intensity statin in the management of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 529-536

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007990903494934

关键词

Cost effectiveness; Familial hypercholesterolaemia; Markov modelling; QALYs; Statins

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Fournier-Solvay
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Merck Sharp Dohme
  5. Pfizer
  6. Sanofi-Aventis
  7. British Heart Foundation [RG3008, PG2005/014]
  8. Commonwealth Fund
  9. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/008/25291] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To estimate, using probabilistic decision-analytic modelling techniques, the cost effectiveness of treating familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients with high-intensity statins compared to treatment with low-intensity statins. For the purpose of this economic analysis, and based on their known differences, statins were categorised as high intensity if they produce greater LDL-cholesterol reductions than simvastatin 40 mg (e. g., simvastatin 80 mg and appropriate doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin or combination of statins + ezetimibe). Methods: A lifetime Markov model was developed to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) of treating a hypothetical cohort of 1000 FH patients aged between 20 and 70 years. Baseline coronary heart disease risks reported in the NICE TA 94 on statins, and age-adjusted risk of cardiovascular disease reported in the FH population, were used to populate the model. A meta-analysis estimate of the reduction in cardiovascular events from using high-intensity compared with low-intensity statins was obtained from published trials. Results were interpreted using a cost-effectiveness threshold of 20 pound 000/QALY. Results: Fewer cardiovascular events and deaths were predicted to occur in the group treated with higher-intensity statins, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated at 11 pound 103/QALY. The ICER remained below the 20 pound 000 threshold for 20-39-year-olds and 40-59-year-olds, but rose above this threshold in individuals aged over 60 years. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that results were most sensitive to variation in treatment effect on mortality and the cost of high-intensity statins. Conclusions: Modelling demonstrates that high-intensity statins are cost-effective for the treatment of younger FH patients. If, as is likely, the relative price of high-intensity statins fall in the future as they come off patent, then their cost effectiveness will improve further.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据