4.4 Review

Progress in Cationic Lipid-Mediated Gene Transfection: A Series of Bio-Inspired Lipids as an Example

期刊

CURRENT GENE THERAPY
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 296-312

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156652308786070989

关键词

Gene transfer; transfection; non-viral vector; bio-inspired lipids; cationic liposomes; lipoplexes; targeting; phosphonolipid; phosphoramide; archaebacteria

资金

  1. Vaincre La Mucoviscidose (Paris, France)
  2. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (Evry, France)
  3. Brest Metropole Oceane
  4. Conseil Regional de Bretagne
  5. Ouest-Genopole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last several years, various gene delivery systems have been developed for gene therapy applications. Although viral vector-based gene therapy has led to the greatest achievements in animal and human studies, synthetic non-viral vectors have also been developed as they offer several advantages over viral systems, including lower immunogenicity and greater nucleic acid packaging capacity. Nevertheless, the transfection efficiency of the current non-viral gene carriers still needs to be improved, especially as regards direct in vivo transfection. In particular, cationic lipid/nucleic acid complexes (termed lipoplexes) have been the subject of intensive investigation with a view to optimize their performance and to better understand their mechanisms of action, and consequently to design new approaches to overcome the critical barriers of cationic liposome-mediated gene delivery. A possible strategy may rely on considering the membrane constituents and properties of the vast variety of living organisms as a source of inspiration for the design of biocompatible, nontoxic and effective novel artificial liposomal systems. Thus, the present forward-looking review provides an overview of the progress already made during the last years in the field of cationic lipid-mediated gene transfection and also focuses on a series of novel bio-inspired lipids for both in vitro and in vivo gene transfection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据