4.4 Review

Bacterial Cell Wall Compounds as Promising Targets of Antimicrobial Agents II. Immunological and Clinical Aspects

期刊

CURRENT DRUG TARGETS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 1131-1137

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138945012802002438

关键词

Antimicrobial agents; bacterial cell wall

资金

  1. German ministry (Ministerium fur Bildung und Forschung) BMBF [01GU0824, 01GU0826]
  2. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo [FIS-PI050768]
  3. Proyectos de Investigacion Universidad de Navarra, Spain [PIUNA-2008-11]
  4. Commission of the European Communities [QLCK2-CT-200201001]
  5. NIH [5U01AI077947, 5U01AI054785, 5U01AI056476]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterial cell wall represents the primary target for antimicrobial agents. Microbial destruction is accompanied by the release of potent immunostimulatory membrane constituents. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria release a variety of lipoproteins and peptidoglycan fragments. Gram-positive bacteria additionally provide lipoteichoic acids, whereas Gram-negative bacteria also release lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin), essential component of the outer leaflet of the bacterial cell wall and one of the most potent immunostimulatory molecules known. Immune activation therefore can be considered as an adverse effect of antimicrobial destruction and killing during anti-infective treatment. In contrast to antibiotics, the use of cationic amphiphilic antimicrobial peptides allows both effective bacterial killing and inhibition of the immunostimulatory effect of the released bacterial membrane constituents. The administration of antimicrobial peptides alone or in combination with antibiotic agents thus represents a novel strategy in the antiinfective treatment with potentially important beneficial aspects. Here, data are presented which describe immunological and clinical aspects of the use of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as therapeutic agents to treat bacterial infection and neutralize the immunostimulatory activity of released cell wall constituents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据