4.3 Review

Absorption, Disposition and Pharmacokinetics of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles

期刊

CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 418-428

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138920012800166526

关键词

Solid lipid nanoparticles; absorption; disposition; biodistribution; pharmacokinetics; biopharmaceutics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81001405]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2009CB930300]
  3. National Key Innovative Drugs Program of China [2009ZX09310-006, 2009ZX09301-011, 2009ZX09313-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are primarily composed of solid lipids, which thus impart to them some of the fundamental properties of these lipids, including biocompatibility, biodegradability and low-toxicity. SLNs represent a unique class of colloidal drug delivery systems that possess the advantages of both the soft drug carriers such as emulsions and liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles. In this review, we will provide an overview on the absorption, disposition and pharmacokinetics of SLNs. The lipidic nature, as well as the relatively small particle size, of SLNs ensures sufficient affinity with the biomembranes, and results in improved absorption by either of the oral, transdermal, pulmonary, nasal, ocular, rectal or buccal route. One special aspect of oral SLNs is the enhanced lymphatic absorption by either the chylomicron-association pathway or the M cell uptaking pathway. Intravenous SLNs are predominantly uptaken by the liver or spleen following opsonization by the complementary system. Modification of SLN surface with PEGs chains will mask the hydrophobic surface and divert SLNs to non-hepatic and non-splenic organs, while ligand-modification will achieve active targeting to specific tissues or organs. Degradation of SLNs is primarily based on the degradation of the lipids themselves by lipase. Pharmacokinetics reflects the effect of the lipidic vehicles of SLNs on in vivo disposition of the loaded drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据