4.8 Article

Recruitment Collapse and Population Structure of the European Eel Shaped by Local Ocean Current Dynamics

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 104-108

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Culture Art and Leisure (NI)
  2. Department of Employment and Learning (NI)
  3. International Max Planck Research School for Evolutionary Biology
  4. Leibniz Institute competitive grant
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EI 841/4-1, EI 841/6-1]
  6. European Union [212643 (EU-THOR)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Worldwide, exploited marine fish stocks are under threat of collapse [1]. Although the drivers behind such collapses are diverse, it is becoming evident that failure to consider evolutionary processes in fisheries management can have drastic consequences on a species' long-term viability [2]. The European eel (Anguilla anguilla; Linnaeus, 1758) is no exception: not only does the steep decline in recruitment observed in the 1980s [3, 4] remain largely unexplained, the punctual detection of genetic structure also raises questions regarding the existence of a single panmictic population [5-7]. With its extended Transatlantic dispersal, pinpointing the role of ocean dynamics is crucial to understand both the population structure and the widespread decline of this species. Hence, we combined dispersal simulations using a half century of high-resolution ocean model data with population genetics tools. We show that regional atmospherically driven ocean current variations in the Sargasso Sea were the major driver of the onset of the sharp decline in eel recruitment in the beginning of the 1980s. The simulations combined with genotyping of natural coastal eel populations furthermore suggest that unexpected evidence of coastal genetic differentiation is consistent with cryptic female philopatric behavior within the Sargasso Sea. Such results demonstrate the key constraint of the variable oceanic environment on the European eel population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据