4.8 Article

Anaerobic Bacteria Grow within Candida albicans Biofilms and Induce Biofilm Formation in Suspension Cultures

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 20, 页码 2411-2416

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.057

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01AI083311, T32AI060537, K99AI100896]
  2. UCSF Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research award - Sandler Foundation
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH [R01HL117328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human microbiome contains diverse microorganisms, which share and compete for the same environmental niches [1, 2]. A major microbial growth form in the human body is the biofilm state, where tightly packed bacterial, archaeal, and fungal cells must cooperate and/or compete for resources in order to survive [3-6]. We examined mixed biofilms composed of the major fungal species of the gut microbiome, Candida albicans, and each of five prevalent bacterial gastrointestinal inhabitants: Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis [7-10]. We observed that biofilms formed by C. albicans provide a hypoxic microenvironment that supports the growth of two anaerobic bacteria, even when cultured in ambient oxic conditions that are normally toxic to the bacteria. We also found that coculture with bacteria in biofilms induces massive gene expression changes in C. albicans, including upregulation of WOR1, which encodes a transcription regulator that controls a phenotypic switch in C. albicans, from the white cell type to the opaque cell type. Finally, we observed that in suspension cultures, C. perfringens induces aggregation of C. albicans into mini-biofilms, which allow C. perfringens cells to survive in a normally toxic environment. This work indicates that bacteria and C. albicans interactions modulate the local chemistry of their environment in multiple ways to create niches favorable to their growth and survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据