4.8 Article

FLRT3 Is a Robo1-Interacting Protein that Determines Netrin-1 Attraction in Developing Axons

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 494-508

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.042

关键词

-

资金

  1. CONSOLIDER fellowship from the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)
  2. short-term European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) mobility fellowship
  3. EMBO long-term fellowship
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB870]
  5. Spanish MICINN [BFU2010-18055, BFU2012-34298]
  6. FP7-PEOPLE-CIG [PCIG9-GA-2011-293980]
  7. CONSOLIDER programme [CSD2007-00023]
  8. ERC [ERC-2009-StG_20081210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Guidance molecules are normally presented to cells in an overlapping fashion; however, little is known about how their signals are integrated to control the formation of neural circuits. In the thalamocortical system, the topographical sorting of distinct axonal subpopulations relies on the emergent cooperation between Slit1 and Netrin-1 guidance cues presented by intermediate cellular targets. However, the mechanism by which both cues interact to drive distinct axonal responses remains unknown. Results: Here, we show that the attractive response to the guidance cue Netrin-1 is controlled by Slit/Robo1 signaling and by FLRT3, a novel coreceptor for Robo1. While thalamic axons lacking FLRT3 are insensitive to Netrin-1, thalamic axons containing FLRT3 can modulate their Netrin-1 responsiveness in a context-dependent manner. In the presence of Slit1, both Robo1 and FLRT3 receptors are required to induce Netrin-1 attraction by the upregulation of surface DCC through the activation of protein kinase A. Finally, the absence of FLRT3 produces defects in axon guidance in vivo. Conclusions: These results highlight a novel mechanism by which interactions between limited numbers of axon guidance cues can multiply the responses in developing axons, as required for proper axonal tract formation in the mammalian brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据