4.8 Article

Horizontal Transfer of a Large and Highly Toxic Secondary Metabolic Gene Cluster between Fungi

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 134-139

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Searle Scholars Program
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-0805625, DEB-0844968]
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0805625] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genes involved in intermediary and secondary metabolism in fungi are frequently physically linked or clustered. For example, in Aspergillus nidulans the entire pathway for the production of sterigmatocystin (ST), a highly toxic secondary metabolite and a precursor to the aflatoxins (AF), is located in a similar to 54 kb, 23 gene cluster. We discovered that a complete ST gene cluster in Podospora anserina was horizontally transferred from Aspergillus. Phylogenetic analysis shows that most Podospora cluster genes are adjacent to or nested within Aspergillus cluster genes, although the two genera belong to different taxonomic classes. Furthermore, the Podospora cluster is highly conserved in content, sequence, and microsynteny with the Aspergillus ST/AF clusters and its intergenic regions contain 14 putative binding sites for AfIR, the transcription factor required for activation of the ST/AF biosynthetic genes. Examination of similar to 52,000 Podospora expressed sequence tags identified transcripts for 14 genes in the cluster, with several expressed at multiple life cycle stages. The presence of putative AfIR-binding sites and the expression evidence for several cluster genes, coupled with the recent independent discovery of ST production in Podospora [1], suggest that this HGT event probably resulted in a functional cluster. Given the abundance of metabolic gene clusters in fungi, our finding that one of the largest known metabolic gene clusters moved intact between species suggests that such transfers might have significantly contributed to fungal metabolic diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据