4.8 Article

Protected and Threatened Components of Fish Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 1044-1050

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation Total
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite project BIODIVMED
  3. Agence National de la Recherche [ANR-09-PEXT-01102 546 EVORANGE]
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique program BIODIVMEX
  5. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship (FISHECO) [IOF-GA-2009-236316]
  6. European Commission [FP7-PEOPLE-2007-4-1-IOF]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mediterranean Sea (0.82% of the global oceanic surface) holds 4%-18% of all known marine species (similar to 17,000), with a high proportion of endemism [1, 2]. This exceptional biodiversity is under severe threats [1] but benefits from a system of 100 marine protected areas (MPAs). Surprisingly, the spatial congruence of fish biodiversity hot spots with this MPA system and the areas of high fishing pressure has not been assessed. Moreover, evolutionary and functional breadth of species assemblages [3] has been largely overlooked in marine systems. Here we adopted a multifaceted approach to biodiversity by considering the species richness of total, endemic, and threatened coastal fish assemblages as well as their functional and phylogenetic diversity. We show that these fish biodiversity components are spatially mismatched. The MPA system covers a small surface of the Mediterranean (0.4%) and is spatially congruent with the hot spots of all taxonomic components of fish diversity. However, it misses hot spots of functional and phylogenetic diversity. In addition, hot spots of endemic species richness and phylogenetic diversity are spatially congruent with hot spots of fishery impact. Our results highlight that future conservation strategies and assessment efficiency of current reserve systems will need to be revisited after de-constructing the different components of biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据