4.8 Article

A Postsynaptic Signaling Pathway that May Account for the Cognitive Defect Due to IL1RAPL1 Mutation

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 103-115

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GACR303/08/1591]
  2. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [AV0Z50520514]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [VZ MSM 0021620820]
  4. Telethon Italy [GGP05236A, GGP06208]
  5. Compagnia di San Paolo
  6. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [EX2006-0294]
  7. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-05-Neuro-040-01, ANR-06-Neuro-003-02]
  8. Fondation Jerome Lejeune
  9. Inserm
  10. Fondazione Cariplo [2006-0779, 2008-2318]
  11. Compagnia di San Paolo [2005.1964]
  12. RSTL-CNR
  13. PRIN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein-like 1 (IL1RAPL1) gene mutations are associated with cognitive impairment ranging from nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation to autism. IL1RAPL1 belongs to a novel family of Toll/IL-1 receptors, whose expression in the brain is upregulated by neuronal activity. Currently, very little is known about the function of this protein. We previously showed that IL1RAPL1 interacts with the neuronal calcium sensor NCS-1 and that it regulates voltage-gated calcium channel activity in PC12 cells. Results: Here we show that IL1RAPL1 is present in dendritic spine where it interacts with PSD-95, a major component of excitatory postsynaptic compartment. Using gain- and loss-of-function experiments in neurons, we demonstrated that IL1RAPL1 regulates the synaptic localization of PSD-95 by controlling c-Jun terminal kinase (JNK) activity and PSD-95 phosphorylation. Mice carrying a null mutation of the mouse Il1rapl1 gene show a reduction of both dendritic spine density and excitatory synapses in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. These structural abnormalities are associated with specific deficits in hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据